United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
353 F.2d 166 · 1965
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 1995 · most notably United States v. Russell (1992), United States v. Leonard (1974)
24 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Rogers · Rhodes v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A juror should listen with deference to the arguments and with a distrust of his own judgment if he finds a large majority of the jury taking a different view of the case from what he does himself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“ ‘of their duty of dissent if dissent is founded upon reasoned conclusions reasonably arrived at and reasonably held.’ ”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.