Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 353 F.2d 316 - Wallie W. Mattice, and Paul Rhodes v. Clarence A. H. Meyer

Wallie W. Mattice, and Paul Rhodes v. Clarence A. H. Meyer’s Empirical Analysis

353 F.2d 316 · 1965

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
2
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently May 2011 · most notably EF Hutton & Company v. Brown (1969), Ramos Colon v. United States Attorney for District of Puerto Rico (1978)

19 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

100196519701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 202 F. Supp. 624 - Rhodes v. Houston · Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. Bancroft · Ginsburg v. Stern · Paul Ginsburg v. Horace Stern and Patrick N. Bolsinger · Paul Rhodes v. Dwain L. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “decides not to proceed with the matter, the complainant has no recourse.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “lacked standing at law to maintain the proceeding as a formal action; absent the pendency of an action,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.