Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

353 F.2d 511

Docket No. 15326.

Petro v. Bakely

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Nov. 30, 1965.

Decided Dec. 7, 1965.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1965-12-07

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1974

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1965-12-07

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Robert Silverman, Philadelphia, Pa.. (Albert C. Gekoski, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.

¶2David H. Moskowitz, Bristol, Pa. (Sirott & Verderame, Bristol, Pa., on the-brief), for appellee.

¶3*512Before HASTIE, GANEY and FREEDMAN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM:

¶5This appeal has been taken from an order of the district court denying a defendant’s motion to dismiss as res judicata an action for negligent injury. No further dispositive action has occurred in the trial court.

¶6While the granting of a motion to dismiss may be a final judgment, the denial of such a motion lacks the finality which is essential .to support an immediate appeal.

¶7The appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

/353/f2d/511 · .json · Public domain