Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 353 F.2d 660 - Waterman Steamship Corp. v. David

Waterman Steamship Corp. v. David’s Empirical Analysis

353 F.2d 660 · 1965

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
4
states following
June 1982
most recently cited

57 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently June 1982 · most notably Grigsby v. Coastal Marine Service of Texas, Inc. (1969), Todd Shipyards Corporation v. Turbine Service Inc Sa Turbine Service Inc (1982)

57 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

490196519701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Seas Shipping Co. v. Sieracki · Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp. · Taylor v. Illinois · Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc. · Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “absent conduct on (the owner's) part sufficient to preclude recovery.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “This obligation is not a quasi-contraetual obligation implied in law or arising out of a noncontractual relationship. It is of the essence of petitioner's stevedoring contract. It is petitioner’s warranty of workmanlike service that is comparable to a manufacturer’s warranty of the soundness of its manufactured product. The shipowner’s action is not changed from one for a breach of contract to one for a tort simply because recovery may turn upon the standard of the performance of petitioner’s stevedoring service.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “warranty of workmanlike service does not put him under the duty to discover defects in equipment furnished him by the shipowner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.