Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 353 F.2d 872 - Ingram v. United States

Ingram v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

353 F.2d 872 · 1965

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
2
states following
September 2010
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently September 2010 · most notably Fuller v. United States (1967), United States v. Anderson (1974)

42 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions

270196519701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Bell v. United States · Gore v. United States · Prince v. United States · United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““four kinds of assault with descending degrees of severity: [1] D.C.Code § 22-501, Assault with intent to kill, rob, rape, or poison (15 years maximum); [2] D.C.Code § 22-502, Assault with intent to commit mayhem or with a dangerous weapon (10 years); [3] D.C.Code § 22-503, Assault with intent to commit any other offense (5 years); [4] D.C.Code § 22-504, Simple Assault (1 year).””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “particularly helpful ... (in) dealing with a unique statute of limited purpose and an inconclusive legislative history”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.