McNeely v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
353 F.2d 913 · 1965
Citation profile
60 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently April 2011 · most notably Klingler v. United States (1969), United States v. Byers (1984)
60 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ditson v. California · Strauss v. United States · Smith v. United States · Thomas v. Akin Equipment, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is an axiom of trial procedure that counsel must take the initiative in protecting the rights of his clients.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`The law cannot expect a patrolman, unschooled in the technicalities of criminal and constitutional law ... to always be able to immediately state with particularity the exact grounds on which he is exercising his authority.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.