United States v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
353 F.3d 130 · 2003
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably United States v. Nucci (2004), United States v. Fiore (2004)
11 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77Q (§ 17 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3562 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663A (§ 204 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3664 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on United States v. Atkinson · United States v. Kinlock · United States v. Giwah · United States v. Soto · United States v. Tortora
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he significance of that schedule is diminished [ ] by the fact that the victim may convert the restitution order into an abstract of judgment for the full amount of the restitution order”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(A) the financial resources and other assets of the defendant, including whether any of these assets are jointly controlled; (B) projected earnings and other income of the defendant; and (C) any financial obligations of the defendant; including obligations to dependents.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in considering restitution sentences imposed under MVRA, we will not vacate and remand ... solely by reason of the sentencing judge's failure to indicate consideration of the mandatory factors.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.