Boone v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis
353 F.3d 203 · 2003
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 6 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1382C (§ 1614 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Bowen v. Yuckert · Albert Shaw v. Shirley S. Chater, as Commissioner of the Social Security Administration · Fargnoli v. Massanari · Jones v. Apfel · Peggy Mayes v. Larry G. Massanari, Commissioner of Social Security
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not adopt[ed] a general rule that an unexplained conflict between a VE's testimony and the DOT necessarily requires reversal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[gjiven that SSR 83-12 suggests that Boone cannot perform most sedentary or fight jobs (because of her need to have the option to sit or stand at will ...), we cannot-as the Commissioner would have us do-assume that the ALJ’s finding that Boone can perform a limited range of light work means that she can perform a significant number of jobs in the economy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e shall not interpret SSR 83-12 to mandate reversal whenever the ALJ does not set out specific findings concerning the erosion of the occupational base if, as here, the ALJ has received the assistance of a VE in considering the more precise question whether there are a significant number of jobs in the economy that the claimant can perform.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.