Hacienda Valley Mobile Estates v. City of Morgan Hill’s Empirical Analysis
353 F.3d 651 · 2003
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2023 · most notably Edwards v. Marin Park, Inc. (2004), Manufactured Home Communities Inc. v. City of San Jose (2005)
22 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Parratt v. Taylor · Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City · Yee v. City of Escondido · National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the Interior · Palazzolo v. Rhode Island
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Facial challenges are exempt from the first prong of the Williamson ripeness analysis because a facial challenge by its nature does not involve a decision applying the statute or regulation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Hacienda is careful to argue that the Ordinance alone is not the basis of its challenge. Instead, it alleges that the Ordinance, complex economic factors, and the Commission's decision not to grant the bulk of Hacienda's rent increase all combined to create a premium in the Park. We conclude that these allegations are sufficient to support an as-applied challenge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The plaintiff must have obtained a final decision from the governmental authority charged with implementing the regulations and must have pursued compensation through state remedies unless doing so would be futile.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.