Arulampalam v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
353 F.3d 679 · 2003
Citation profile
28 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 140 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Shrestha v. Holder (2010), Don v. Gonzales (2007)
28 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Ghaly v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Navaratwam Kamalthas v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Satnam Singh-Kaur Hari Singh v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Mario Ernesto Navas v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 140 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“alien's testimony, if unrefuted and credible, direct and specific, is sufficient to establish the facts testified without the need for any corroboration”) overruled on other grounds by Abebe v. Mukasey, 554 F.3d 1203 , 1208 (9th Cir.2009) (en banc) (per curiam), petition for cert. filed, No. 09-600, 78 U.S.L.W. 3322 (Nov. 16, 2009); Kataria v. INS, 232 F.3d 1107 , 1113 (9th Cir.2000) (noting that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Joseph v. Holder“it is inappropriate to base an adverse credibility determination on an applicant's inability to obtain corroborating affidavits from relatives or acquaintances living outside of the United States—such corroboration is almost never easily available.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bhasin v. Gonzales“the expression of his countenance, how he sits or stands, whether he is inordinately nervous, his coloration during critical examination, the modulation or pace of his speech and other non-verbal communication.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jibril v. Gonzales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.