United States v. Revock’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3558 · 18 U.S.C. § 3624
Relies on United States v. Booker · Blakely v. Washington · United States v. Wogan · United States v. Thurston · 326 F. Supp. 2d 176 - United States v. Zompa
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... a very narrow category of cases. It applies to defendants with similar records who engaged in joint criminal behavior where one participant — sentenced between Blakely and Booker without an appeal of the sentence — received the benefit of this District’s post-Blakely approach, while the other participant was sentenced after Booker, without receiving the same benefit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.