Robinson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 4 district · 115 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 127 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably Lockshin v. Semsker (2010), Philip Morris Inc. v. Angeletti (2000)
4 federal appellate · 4 district · 115 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Illinois Power Co. v. Local Union No. 51, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers · Brower v. United States · State v. Albrecht · Newton v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 127 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To be sure, the language of the 1996 assault statutes contain no specific words of repeal or abrogation, nor is there any conflict between those statutes and the common law. We have determined, however, that the statutes as adopted represent the entire subject matter of the law of assault and battery in Maryland, and as such, abrogate the common law on the subject.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“(b) Assault. — Except as otherwise provided in this subheading, ''assault” means the offenses of assault, battery, and assault and battery, which terms retain their judicially determined meanings.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Christian v. State · Watts v. State“"§ 12A. Second degree assault. "(a) General Prohibition.—A person may not commit an assault.””
4 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.