Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 353 N.C. 1 - State v. Davis

State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
2
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

58 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Payne v. Tennessee · Jones v. United States · Rushen v. Spain · State v. Odom

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All right, Members of the Jury, having found the defendant guilty of murder in the first degree, it is now your duty to recommend to the Court whether the defendant should be sentenced to death or to life imprisonment. A sentence of life imprisonment means a sentence of life without parole.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is established law in North Carolina that it is error to submit two aggravating circumstances when the evidence to support each is precisely the same. Conversely, where the aggravating circumstances are supported by separate evidence, it is not error to submit both to the jury, even though the evidence supporting each may overlap.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “We find nothing in the statute that requires the judge to state 'life imprisonment without parole' every time he alludes to or mentions the alternative sentence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.