353 N.J. Super. 590 - State v. Sisler’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ashcroft Attorney General v. Free Speech Coalition · Jersey City Chapter of Property Owner's Protective Ass'n v. City Council of Jersey City · Donadio v. Cunningham · STATE, DEPT. OF LAW v. Gonzalez · LaFage v. Jani
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any person who knowingly possesses or knowingly views any photograph, film, videotape, computer program or file, video game or any other reproduction or reconstruction which depicts a child engaging in a prohibited sexual act or in the simulation of such an act, including on the Internet, is guilty of a crime of the fourth degree. [N.J.S.A. 2C:24r4b(5)(b) (emphasis added).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Sisler“Any person who photographs or films a child in a prohibited sexual act or in the simulation of such an act or who uses any device, including a computer, to reproduce or reconstruct the image of a child in a prohibited sexual act or in the simulation of such an act is guilty of a crime of the second degree. [N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4b(4).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Sisler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.