State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 1985
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Norgaard · State v. Hawkins · State v. Hamilton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The defense alleges the trial court erred in not allowing evidence of her pending forgery charges, claiming that “Ms. Crossland was shading her testimony to please the state.” It is difficult to follow this logic. Crossland was not a co-defendant of appellant, hoping for a reduced charge or sentence if she testified against him. She was the victim of a (■ape by defendant. There was no error in disallowing this evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Southard
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.