Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 353 NW2D 656 - State v. Taylor

State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
January 1985
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Norgaard · State v. Hawkins · State v. Hamilton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defense alleges the trial court erred in not allowing evidence of her pending forgery charges, claiming that “Ms. Crossland was shading her testimony to please the state.” It is difficult to follow this logic. Crossland was not a co-defendant of appellant, hoping for a reduced charge or sentence if she testified against him. She was the victim of a (■ape by defendant. There was no error in disallowing this evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.