¶1The judgment appealed from is affirmed, but this case is remanded for resentencing of appellant. The present sentence does *960not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975); Brooks v. State, 349 So.2d 794 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Moreover, the phrase “at hard labor” in the sentence is improper. Brooks v. State, supra.The appellant does not have to be present at resentencing.
353 So. 2d 959
Morrow v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 13, 1978
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1978-01-13
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1993
1 state decisions
Relies on 349 So. 2d 794 - Brooks v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1978-01-13
View the full empirical analysis of this case →