Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 353 SW3D 797 - Pena, Jose Luis

Pena, Jose Luis’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 43 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco))

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · United States v. Agurs · Kyles v. Whitley · Weatherford v. Bursey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen part of an act, declaration, conversation, writing or recorded statement is given in evidence by one party, the whole on the same subject may be inquired into by the other, and any other act, declaration, writing or recorded statements which is necessary to make it fully understood or to explain the same may also be given in evidence....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is designed to reduce the possibility of the jury receiving a false impression from hearing only a part of some act, conversation, or writing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “be clear enough to provide the judge and the opposing party an opportunity to address and, if necessary, correct the purported error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.