Volume 353 — United States Reports

This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 353 of the United States Reports:

from 21 intentionally omitted] Mr. Mozart G. Ratner, Chicago, Ill., for petitioners. Mr. Stanley Denlinger, Akron, Ohio, for respondent. [Amicus curiae information intentionally omitted] Mr. Chief Justice WARREN delivered the opinion of the Court. 1 Respondent operates three meat markets in the vicinity of Akron, Ohio.

Held: 35 'It suffices to say that the Norris-LaGuardia Act can affect the present decree only so far as its provisions are found not to conflict with those of § 2, Ninth, of the Railway Labor Act, (45 U.S.C.A. § 152, subd. 9), authorizing the relief which has been granted.

NLRB v. Truck Drivers Local 449 (Buffalo Linen Supply Co.), 353 U.S. 87 (1957), is an 8-0 decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that a temporary lockout by a multi-employer bargaining group threatened by a whipsaw strike was lawful under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), as amended by the Taft-Hartley Act.

Held: on the basis of the cases dealing with pre-1871 legislation, that right of way granted by the 1875 Act 'is * * * a limited fee, * * * and carries with it the incidents and remedies usually attending the fee.' Id., 239 U.S. at page 47, 36 S.Ct. at page 6. 4 In explaining why the House Public Lands Committee had inserted a clause similar to § 4 of the 1875 Act in a special right of way bill considered in 1872,…

Held: 134 F.Supp., at pages 147—149 and 138 F.Supp. at pages 136—137, that under §§ 5(2)(b) and 17(3), appellees were entitled to an evidentiary hearing of some sort in the merger-status order proceeding (as distinguished from the subsequent preferred stock proceeding) even though the Commission had discretion to dispense with a 'public hearing.' Section 5(2)(b), in its relevant portion, provides: 51 'Whenever a…

Held: 13 'Under the established general rule a statute of limitation runs against the United States only when they assent and upon the conditions prescribed. Here assent that the statute might begin to run was conditioned upon the presentation of a return duly sworn to.

Held: by a divided vote, 5 that since the Teamster group was composed of unions, all engaged in a nonprofit">nonprofit business, the criteria applied to other nonprofit">nonprofit employers should govern.

from pages 391-392 intentionally omitted] Mr. Edward J. Bennett, New York City, for petitioner grunewald. Mr. Henry G. Singer, Brooklyn, N.Y., for petitioner Halperin. Mr. Rudolph Stand, New York City, for petitioner Bolich. Mr. John F. Davis, Washington, D.C., for the respondent in all three cases.

from pages 586-587 intentionally omitted] Mr. John F. Davis, Washington, D.C., for the appellant. Mr. Hugh B. Cox, Washington, D.C., for the appellee E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. Mr. Robert L. Stern, Chicago, Ill., for the appellee General Motors Corporation.

Jencks v. United States, 353 U.S. 657 (1957), is a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the court held that the federal government must produce documents relied upon by government witnesses in federal criminal proceedings.