Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 353 U.S. 692 - Mulcahey v. Catalanotte

Mulcahey v. Catalanotte’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

118
cited by 118 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
July 2013
most recently cited

85 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 118 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2013 · most notably Moosa v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1999), Alfonso Aragon-Ayon v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Juan Tafolla Ramirez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (2000)

85 federal appellate ·

4701957196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedCatalanotte v. Butterfield (from Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Harisiades v. Shaughnessy · Galvan v. Press · Ng Fung Ho v. White · Marcello v. Bonds · Mahler v. Eby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 118 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “who at any time has been convicted of a violation of * * * any law or regulation relating to the illicit possession of or traffic in narcotic drugs or marihuana.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “notwithstanding ... that the facts ... occurred prior to the date of Enactment of this Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “indisputable ... that Congress was legislating retrospectively”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.