Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 353 WIS2D 280 - State v. Lasanske

State v. Lasanske’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Delaney · State v. Volk · State v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Lasanske was eligible for up to two years of imprisonment on each count to which he pled. His sentence had to be bifurcated, with no more than 75% of the total length of the bifurcated sentence as confinement and no less than 25% of the length of the term of confinement as extended supervision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “whenever a court sentences a person to imprisonment in the Wisconsin state prisons.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.