Miller v. Connally’s Empirical Analysis
354 F.2d 206 · 1965
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently November 1982 · most notably United States v. Kopituk (1982), In re Grand Jury Proceedings of Fine (1981)
26 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass'n · Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. Holland · Hyde v. United States · Ex parte Fahey · Platt v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... They are not to be used as a substitute for an appeal, or to”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.