Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 354 F.2d 35 - Walton v. Eckhart

Walton v. Eckhart’s Empirical Analysis

354 F.2d 35 · 1965

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
April 2020
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2020

13 federal appellate ·

1001965197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jiffy Markets, Inc. v. Vogel · Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad · Johnson v. Baker · Blessing v. Welding

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This proposition was aptly expressed by Judge Graven in Chicago & North Western Ry. Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. R. Co., 179 F.Supp. 33, 55 (N.D. Ia.1959): 17”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.