Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 354 F.2d 401 - Lundeen v. Cordner

Lundeen v. Cordner’s Empirical Analysis

354 F.2d 401 · 1966

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
6
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 6 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably Cervantes v. Time, Inc. (1972), Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Puerto Rico (1990)

23 federal appellate · 6 district · 9 state decisions

1701966197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1783

Relies on Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp. · Dyer v. MacDougall · Radio City Music Hall Corp. v. United States · Robin Construction Co. v. United States · Luhrs v. . Luhrs

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"When a motion for summary judgment is made and supported as provided in this rule, an adverse party may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of his pleading, but his response, by affidavits or as otherwise provided in this rule, must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that something might turn up at the trial.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It has been held that the clear affidavits from the only persons in a position to be aware of a factual situation can well serve as the basis for a summary judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.