Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

354 F.2d 515

Docket No. 19367.

De Gaster v. Fowler

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1965-11-23

2 counsel of record

Relies on Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. · American Medical Ass'n v. United States · Holley v. Lawrence

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1965-11-23

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 1982

5 federal appellate ·

30196519701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; William B. Jones, Judge. 247 F.Supp. 511 (1963).

Mr. Samuel Herman, with whom Mr. William H. Collins, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellants.

Mr. John C. Eldridge, Attorney, Department of Justice, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. John W. Douglas, Mr. John C. Conliff, Jr., U.S. Atty. at the time the brief was filed, and Mr. Morton Hollander, Attorney, Department of Justice, were on the brief, for appellee.

Before WRIGHT, TAMM and LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

¶1

This case came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and was argued by counsel.

¶2

On consideration whereof, and this court being in general agreement with the excellent opinion filed by the District Court in this case,

¶3

It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in this case be, and it is hereby, affirmed.

/354/f2d/515 · .json · Public domain