National Labor Relations Board v. Mira-Pak, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
354 F.2d 525 · 1965
Citation profile
19 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. · Republic Aviation Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board · American Ship Building Company v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. Babcock & Wilcox Co. · National Labor Relations Board v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As we have stated repeatedly, this Court `may [not] displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views' and inferences, `even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo.' NLRB v. Coats & Clarke, Inc., 5 Cir., 231 F.2d 567 , 572. Here there was sufficient evidence on the record as a whole to warrant the Board's drawing the inference that the discharges had been illegally made.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.