Canaday v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
354 F.2d 849 · 1966
Citation profile
61 federal appellate · 5 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 90 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2016 · most notably United States v. Nobles (1975), United States v. Davis (1981)
61 federal appellate · 5 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3500 · 26 U.S.C. § 7201
Relies on Holland v. United States · Nardone v. United States · Dunn v. United States · Jencks v. United States · Rodriguez v. New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any communications to [attorney] or documents in his custody were not subject to the [attorney-client] privilege”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.