Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 354 F.3d 801 - Smith v. Chase Group, Inc.

Smith v. Chase Group, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

354 F.3d 801 · 2004

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dace v. ACF Industries, Inc. · White v. Pence · Bonner v. ISP Technologies, Inc. · Dickens v. Snodgrass, Dunlap & Co. · Keenan v. Computer Associates International, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A grant of JAML is proper only if the evidence viewed according to this standard would not permit `reasonable jurors to differ as to the conclusions that could be drawn.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[E]rrors regarding jury instructions will not demand reversal unless they result in prejudice to the appealing party.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.