354 Ill. App. 3d 265 - People v. Stackhouse’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 2022
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · 122 Ill. 2d 176 - People v. Enoch · 209 Ill. 2d 194 - People v. Evans · 169 Ill. 2d 1 - People v. Keene · 203 Ill. 2d 335 - People v. Crespo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Before a third person is permitted to testify as to a witness’s out-of-court statement of identification [under section 115 — 12], the witness must first testify as to the out-of-court identification. *** When a declarant *** testifies but fails to give testimony concerning his out-of-court statement of identification, it is inadmissible hearsay for a third party *** to testify that the declarant made the out-of-court statement of identification.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Clear and unequivocal testimony that no identification was ever made of the defendant by the victim of the crime precludes the admissibility of an out-of-court identification statement by a third party no less so than when no testimony is elicited from the victim regarding ‘his out-of-court statement of identification.’ Bradley, 336 Ill. App. 3d at 70 .” Stackhouse, 354 Ill. App. 3d at 279 , 820 N.E.2d at 1039 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““A statement is not rendered inadmissible by the hearsay rule if (a) the declarant testifies at the trial or hearing before any third party testifies about any statement of identification the declarant has given, and (b) the declarant is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and (c) the statement is one of identification of a person made after perceiving him.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.