Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 354 N.C. 28 - State v. Taylor

State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Witherspoon v. Illinois · Lockett v. Ohio · Wainwright v. Witt · Massiah v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Ordinarily, a motion to continue is addressed to the discretion of the trial court, and absent a gross abuse of that discretion, the trial court's ruling is not subject to review.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “an arrest warrant for first-degree murder in this state is not a formal charge”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “If scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.