State v. Anthony’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
126
cited by 126 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
124 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Wainwright v. Witt · Adams v. Texas · Negron v. United States · State v. Odom · Crane v. Stern
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 126 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]nly an extreme impropriety on the part of the prosecutor will compel this Court to hold that the trial judge abused his discretion in not recognizing and correcting ex mero motu an argument that defense counsel apparently did not believe was prejudicial when originally spoken.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“' In determining the sufficiency of the evidence to submit an aggravating circumstance to the jury, the trial court must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, with the State entitled to every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Bell · State v. McNeill“'so infected the trial with unfairness that they rendered the conviction fundamentally unfair.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.