Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 354 NW2D 239 - State v. Losee

State v. Losee’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
3
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably 115 Ohio St. 3d 22 - State v. Mundt (2007), State v. Sanders (1994)

24 state decisions

1301984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chambers v. Mississippi · Pointer v. Texas · United States v. Alexander · State v. Conner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) counsel’s performance was so deficient that counsel was not functioning as the “counsel” guaranteed by the sixth amendment, and (2) the deficient performance so prejudiced the defense as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “An accomplice is a person who willfully unites in, or is in some way concerned in the commission of a crime. The general rule for determining whether a witness is an accomplice is if he could be charged with and convicted of the specific offense for which an accused is on trial. But something more than mere knowledge that a crime is contemplated, or mere personal presence at the time and place where committed, must be shown in order to make one an accomplice. And it must be established by a preponderance of the evidence that a witness was in fact an accomplice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.