Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 354 NW2D 924 - Booth v. Booth

Booth v. Booth’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
January 1992
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Estate of Hobelsberger · Kressly v. Kressly · Lien v. Lien · Guindon v. Guindon · Hanks v. Hanks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The amount and length of alimony payments is ... left to the discretion of the trial court. SDCL 25-4-41.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In view of the fact that there is an adequate basis in the record to support each of the trial court's findings regarding the division of property, and because it quite clearly appears that the trial court took into account all of the pertinent factors in making that division, we cannot say the trial court abused its discretion in dividing the property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.