State v. Pipkin’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when the indictment charges a single violation of a crime but the evidence permits the jury to find multiple, separate occurrences of that crime.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“One situation occurs when a statute defines one crime but specifies alternative ways in which that crime can be committed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“" Pipkin stands for the premise that a defendant can commit the crime of burglary if he or she forms the intent to commit a crime at any point before or during his or her unlawful presence within a building, regardless of the particular moment at which the criminal intent arose. To the extent that J. N. S. holds to the contrary, it is no longer good law."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.