Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 354 S.C. 58 - Dawkins v. Fields

Dawkins v. Fields’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

85
cited by 85 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

85 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sheinkopf v. Stone · Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. · George v. Fabri · Askanase v. Fatjo · United States v. Sinclair

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Rule 56(c) of the South Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a trial court may grant a motion for summary judgment `if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The purpose of summary judgment is to expedite disposition of cases which do not require the services of a fact finder.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.