Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 354 SO2D 535 - State v. Meunier

State v. Meunier’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
4
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently March 2016

24 state decisions

8019781980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 278 So. 2d 485 - State v. Douglas · State v. Bourg · 339 So. 2d 755 - State v. Clift · 337 So. 2d 192 - State v. McCoy · 344 So. 2d 360 - State v. De La Beckwith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n a criminal prosecution, an accused shall be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A statute or bill of information meets the constitutional test that it must inform the accused of the nature and cause of the accusation him if the bill of information or indictment contains all of the essential elements of the crime intended to be charged in sufficient particularity 1) to enable the defendant to prepare for trial, 2) to allow the court to determine the propriety of the evidence which is submitted upon the trial in order that it may impose the correct punishment upon a verdict of guilty, and 3) to afford protection from subsequent prosecutions for the same offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"The words are common and ordinary with well-defined meanings. It is common knowledge that it is unlawful to use a telephone for the purposes set forth in the statute. It would be impracticable to set forth in detail the numerous forms harassment could take."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.