Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 354 So. 2d 540 - State v. Nelson

354 So. 2d 540 - State v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 1992
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 1992

1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

70197819801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McGuire v. United States · 343 So. 2d 118 - State v. Glover · State v. Wood · United States v. Harrison · Espinoza v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The store's security guards, who were not commissioned as police officers, detained and questioned the accused under purported authority of La.C.Cr.P. art. 215, the `shoplifters' statute. This permits `a specifically authorized employee of a merchant' to `use reasonable force to detain a person for questioning on the merchant's premises,' when there is reasonable cause (as there was here) to believe that the detained person has committed a theft of the merchant's goods held for sale. However, even though there may be probable cause for detention and inquiry, the search itself may be unreasonable in method or extent so as to go beyond the statutory authorization. "Id. at 542.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “color of authority claimed by virtue of a statute that permitted private persons to use reasonable force”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.