Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 354 So. 2d 869 - McCall v. State

354 So. 2d 869 - McCall v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
June 1997
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 1997

8 state decisions

40197819801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grayned v. City of Rockford · Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District · Grayned v. City of Rockford · Coates v. City of Cincinnati · Brown v. State of Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “. . . not narrowly tailored to further the state's legitimate interest,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Any person who upbraids, abuses or insults any member of the instructional staff on school property or in the presence of the pupils at a school activity, or any person not otherwise subject to the rules and regulations of the school who creates a disturbance on the property or grounds of any school, who commits any act that interrupts the orderly conduct of a school or any activity thereof shall be guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree, punishable as provided by law. This section shall not apply to any pupil in or subject to the discipline of a school. [Emphasis supplied.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “While it is true that rights protected by the First Amendment are not magically lost when one steps upon school property, `neither teachers, students, nor anyone else has an absolute constitutional right to use all parts of a school building for unlimited expressive purposes.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.