¶1The judgment appealed is affirmed, but this case is remanded for resentencing of appellant. The present sentence does not specifically set forth the period of credit time to be allowed as required by Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1975); Brooks v. State, 349 So.2d 794 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). Moreover, the phrase “at hard labor” in the sentence is improper. Brooks v. State, supra.The appellant does not have to be present at resentencing.
354 So. 2d 914
Register v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 27, 1978
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1978-01-27
Relies on 349 So. 2d 794 - Brooks v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1978-01-27
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 1998
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →