Sanchez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1)[O]n or before the 14th day before the date the proceeding begins, the party intending to offer the statement: (A) notifies the adverse party of its intention to do so; (B) provides the adverse party with the name of the witness through whom it intends to offer the statement; and (C) provides the adverse party with a written summary of the statement; (2) the trial court finds, in a hearing conducted outside the presence of the jury, that the statement is reliable based on the time, content, and circumstances of the statement; and (3) the child or person with a disability testifies or is available to testify at the proceeding in court or in any other manner provided by law.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Bays, Michael Jay

2. “the trial court allowed the outcry witness’s testimony from a pre-trial hearing to be read to the jury” over Sanchez's objection. Id. at 478 . The court of criminal appeals determined that a hearing held under article 38.072”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Brian Taylor v. State

3. “defendant’s opportunity for cross-examining the outcry witness at such a hearing is inadequate to allow the admission of the hearing testimony at trial,” and that”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Brian Taylor v. State