Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 354 U.S. 284 - International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 695 v. Vogt, Inc.

International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 695 v. Vogt, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1957

Citation profile

449
cited by 449 later decisions
20
cited 20 times by the Supreme Court
29
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

112 federal appellate · 21 district · 217 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 449 later decisions (20 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2017 · most notably Broadrick v. Oklahoma (1973), Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National Union (1979)

112 federal appellate · 21 district · 217 state decisions — followed in 29 states

14501957196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 101 (Norris-LaGuardia Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act)

Relies on Thornhill v. Alabama · Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co. · Truax v. Corrigan · Milk Wagon Drivers Union of Chicago Local 753 v. Meadowmoor Dairies · Davidson v. New Orleans

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 449 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““This series of cases, then, established a broad field in which a State, in enforcing some public policy, whether of its criminal or its civil law, and whether announced by its legislature or its courts, could constitutionally enjoin peaceful picketing aimed at preventing effectuation of that policy.””
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. ““It is inherent in the concept embodied in the Due Process Clause that its scope be determined by a ‘gradual process of judicial inclusion and exclusion,’ Davidson v. New Orleans, 96 U. S. 97, 104 . Inevitably, therefore, the doctrine of a particular case ‘is not allowed to end with its enunciation and . . . an expression in an opinion yields later to the impact of facts unforeseen.’ Jaybird Mining Co. v. Weir, 271 U. S. 609, 619 (Brandeis, J., dissenting). It is not too surprising that the response of States — legislative and judicial — to use of the injunction in labor controversies should have given rise to a series of adjudications in this Court relating to the limitations on state action contained in the provisions of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth 'Amendment. It is also not too surprising that examination of these adjudications should disclose an evolving, not a static, course of decision.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. ““This series of cases, then, established a broad field in which a State, in enforcing some public policy, whether of its criminal or its civil law, and whether announced by its legislature or its courts, could constitutionally enjoin peaceful picketing aimed at preventing effectuation of that policy.” 354 U.S. 293 , 77 S.Ct. 1171 . “The series of cases following Thornhill and Swing demonstrate that the policy of Wisconsin enforced by the prohibition of this picketing is a valid one. In this case, the circumstances set forth in the opinion of the Wisconsin Supreme Court afford a rational basis for the inference it drew concerning the purpose of the picketing.” 354 U.S. 295 , 77 S.Ct. 1171 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.