Public-domain · open source

355 F.2d 108

Docket No. 19547.

Diana Kearny Powell v. Henry H. Paige and John E. Powell

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued November 29, 1965.

Decided December 9, 1965.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1965-12-09

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1965

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on International Ass'n of Machinists v. Duckworth · New York Stock Exchange v. Legate · United States v. Mississippi

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1965-12-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; George L. Hart, Jr., District Judge.

Miss Diana Kearny Powell, Washington, D. C., appellant pro se.

Mr. Albert E. Brault, Washington, D. C., for appellees.

Before BURGER, WRIGHT and LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The issues raised by this appeal have been before this court in one form or another on several occasions. See Powell v. National Savings and Trust Company, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 290, 296 F.2d 412, cert. denied, 368 U.S. 946, 82 S.Ct. 387, 7 L. Ed.2d 343 (1961), rehearing denied, 368 U.S. 1005, 82 S.Ct. 597, 7 L.Ed.2d 547 (1962); Powell v. National Savings & Trust Co., 114 U.S.App.D.C. 269, 314 F. 2d 274 (1963), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 920, 85 S.Ct. 275, 13 L.Ed.2d 334 (1964), rehearing denied, 379 U.S. 984, 85 S.Ct. 643, 13 L.Ed.2d 577 (1965); Powell v. National Savings and Trust Company, No. 17,658, decided November 19, 1963, rehearing en banc denied, January 15, 1964; Powell v. National Savings and Trust Company, No. 18,292, decided May 19, 1964. We have carefully considered the record, the briefs and the oral argument of appellant. We find nothing new contained therein which would require a reversal of the District Court's judgment in this case.

¶2

Affirmed.