Hurt v. Page’s Empirical Analysis
355 F.2d 169 · 1966
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
July 1981
most recently cited
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Townsend v. Sain · Fay v. Noia · New Orleans Insurance Exchange v. United States · Association of Lithuanian Workers v. Brownell · Hurt v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may refuse to relitigate the factual issues and, indeed, when the district judge concludes `that the habeas application was afforded a full and fair hearing by the state court resulting in reliable findings, he may, and ordinarily should, accept the facts as found in the hearing.' Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293 , 318, 83 S.Ct. 745, 760 [9 L.Ed.2d 770].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Taylor v. Page
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.