Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 F.2d 218 - Morrison v. United States

Morrison v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

355 F.2d 218 · 1966

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
October 1974
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 1231

Relies on Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. South Texas Lumber Co · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Flowers · Brewster v. Gage · Boehm v. Commissioner · Helvering v. Winmill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In the case of any property used in the trade or business and of any capital asset held for more than 6 months and held for the production of income, this subsection shall not apply to any loss, in respect of which the taxpayer is not compensated for by insurance in any amount, arising from fire, storm, shipwreck, or other casualty, or from theft.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Your committee has provided this section to separate certain uninsured casualty losses from the computation of section 1231 gain or loss, but only with respect to property used in the trade or business and capital assets held for the production of income which have been held for more than 6 months. The amendment applies with respect to, for example, loss incurred as a result of the destruction of a taxpayer’s oil tanks which he used for oil storage in his trade or business, but on which he was unable to obtain insurance. On the other hand, the amendment does not apply to loss arising from the destruction or theft of the taxpayer’s uninsured personal automobile.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Treasury regulations and interpretations long continued without substantial change, applying to unamended or substantially reenacted statutes, are deemed to have received congressional approval and have the effect of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.