Sobota v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis
355 F.2d 368 · 1966
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 2007
18 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fay v. Noia · Miller v. Crouse · Cordova v. Cox · Linden v. Dickson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A fundamental principle of law in [habeas corpus proceedings] is that the rule of res judicata does not apply.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Campos v. Bravo
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.