Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 F.2d 397 - Lattin v. Cox

Lattin v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis

355 F.2d 397 · 1966

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
3
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

39 federal appellate · 3 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably Kimbrough v. Beto (1969), Wellnitz v. Page (1970)

39 federal appellate · 3 district · 16 state decisions

470196619701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Escobedo v. Illinois · MacHibroda v. United States · Kercheval v. United States · Waley v. Johnston · United States of America Ex Rel. John McGrath v. J. E. Lavallee, Warden of Clinton Prison, Dannemora, New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We believe the evidence available to the court below justified its finding that the plea was voluntary. * * * But the most compelling reason to believe that the plea was voluntary is the fact that at the time the plea was entered, Lattin was represented by a highly capable attorney who had been retained to defend him.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The District Attorney for the State of New Mexico did not threaten Lattin with any action that was illegitimate or any charges that were unrealistic.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he plea of guilty, in the absence of a showing of prejudice to the accused, was a waiver of all non-jurisdictional defects.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.