Charles Dorf v. John J. Relles’s Empirical Analysis
355 F.2d 488 · 1966
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently November 2012 · most notably United States v. Decoster (1976), 258 Cal. App. 2d 136 - Lysick v. Walcom (1968)
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Priest v. Dodsworth · Olson v. North · 3 Ill. App. 2d 281 - Mock v. Higgins · 180 Ill. App. 334 - Moline v. Christie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When any counselor or attorney at law, residing in any other state or territory, may desire to practice law in this state, such counselor or attorney shall be allowed to practice in the several courts of law and equity in this state upon the same terms and in the same manner that counselors and attorneys at law residing in this state now are or hereafter may be admitted to practice law in such other state or territory.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the rules of evidence governing the trial of cases for malpractice against a lawyer are the same as those against a doctor or dentist,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.