Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

355 F.2d 544

Docket No. 22591.

Hardy v. Balkcom

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1966-01-31

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1966

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1966-01-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

John R. Hardy, pro se.

Peyton S. Hawes, Asst. Atty. Gen., Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., Carter A. Setliff, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before GEWIN and BELL, Circuit Judges, and HUGHES, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The only errors presented for determination by appellant, a Georgia prisoner, to the District Court on the hearing of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus are without merit. There was no proof that he was denied counsel at any critical stage of the state court proceedings against him, nor was there any proof that Negroes were systematically excluded from the Fulton County, Georgia jury at the time of his trial.

¶2

Affirmed.

/355/f2d/544 · .json · Public domain