King v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
355 F.2d 700 · 1966
Citation profile
101 federal appellate · 13 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 138 later decisions — most recently September 2021 · most notably United States v. Boylan (1990), United States v. Natanel (1991)
101 federal appellate · 13 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schaffer v. United States · Drew v. United States · Moses Lake Homes, Inc. v. Grant County · People v. . Molineux · McElroy v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 138 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Two or more defendants may be charged in the same indictment or information if they are alleged to have participated in the same act or transaction or in the same series of acts or transactions constituting an offense or offenses. Such defendants may be charged in one or more counts together or separately and all of the defendants need not be charged in each count.””
9 later decisions quote this exact passage““this possibility of benefit should explicitly appear from the indictment or from other representations by the government before trial. Classic examples of such a benefit are when there is an overlapping of issues, ... or when defendants are charged with conspiracy to conceal a crime that part of their number are charged with committing. . .. ” King v. United States, 355 F.2d at 704 .”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“the same series of acts or transactions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.