Petersen v. Dunbar’s Empirical Analysis
355 F.2d 800 · 1966
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 2003
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 53 Cal. 2d 370 - People v. Banks · People v. Bennett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Upon such revocation and termination the court may, if the sentence has been suspended, pronounce judgment after said suspension of the sentence for any time within the longest period for which the defendant might have been sentenced, * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Howard v. Craven“[a]ppellant persuasively argues that punishment is punishment, no matter what name you apply to it,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“accepts arguendo appellant's characterization of his road camp duty as punishment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.