Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 355 F.2d 924 - Flaherty v. United States

Flaherty v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

355 F.2d 924 · 1966

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
April 1988
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 1988

11 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

60196619701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Desmond v. United States · United States v. Cone · Driscoll v. United States · Kitchell v. United States · DeCecco v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]ll issues not affirmatively conceded are “disputed” on a plea of not guilty. While it might not have that effect on a lawyer, to tell the jury that something is undisputed may well suggest that it is conceded. If the court wishes to comment on the evidence, or to summarize the evidence, it should ordinarily do so in a manner that does not reflect on the defendant’s failure to offer rebuttal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If you were in the wagering business, would you have registered and purchased a federal stamp?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the incriminatory answer was precisely the one that would appear to be exculpatory.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.